Cut a slice about 100 nm thin out of a chosen spot of a microchip and carry it to a TEM grid: protective cap, trenches, cleaning, J-cut, lift-out, thinning and low-kV polishing, with gallium or plasma ions.

A TEM lamella is a slab of the specimen thin enough for electrons to pass through: below ~100 nm for high-resolution work. The focused ion beam cuts it out of a chosen site, here a bond pad of a microchip over three copper wiring levels, and thins it on a TEM grid. The electron beam watches every step without damaging the site.
| Step | Pattern (Ga⁺, 30 kV) | Current | Time | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Site, eucentric height, coating | none | imaging only | 5 min |
| 2 | Electron-beam Pt | 14 × 2 µm, 0.25 µm thick | 3.2 nA e⁻, 5 kV | 3.4 min |
| 3 | Ion-beam Pt cap | 14 × 2 µm, 1.4 µm thick | 100 pA (≈4 pA/µm²) | 8.5 min |
| 4 | Bulk trenches | 2 regular cross-sections 16 × 10 µm, 7 µm deep | 9 nA | 2 × 4.6 min |
| 5 | Cleaning cross-sections | 2 × 15 × 2.4 µm, to a 1 µm wall | 0.8 nA | 2 × 18 min |
| 6 | J-cut and lift-out | side and bottom cuts; needle, Pt welds | 2.5 nA | ~12 min |
| 7 | Thinning | both faces, ±1.5° over-tilt | 800 → 50 pA | ~14 min |
| 8 | Low-kV polish | both faces at 5 kV, then 2 kV | 50 / 25 pA | ~6 min |
Times are instrument time for the FIB-view chip, computed by the simulator (about 1.5 h in all). On a real instrument add navigation, imaging and drift checks. With a xenon plasma FIB, the trenches take minutes at 60 nA; thinning and polishing follow the same steps.
Coincidence point: where the electron and ion beams cross, 52° apart. A sample at eucentric height sits on it: tilting does not move the site, and both beams see the same spot.
Regular cross-section (RCS): a staircase trench, deepest at its face. Cleaning cross-section (CCS): line-by-line milling toward the face, which leaves it flat and clean.
Application file: the material the software assumes to turn a depth into a dose (silicon here). Other materials end up deeper or shallower.
Result. The site is at eucentric height and centred in both beams.

| Current density | Net growth | Regime |
|---|---|---|
| 1 pA/µm² | 1.08 µm³/nC | reaction-limited |
| 2 pA/µm² | 0.93 µm³/nC | recommended |
| 4 pA/µm² | 0.73 µm³/nC | |
| 6 pA/µm² | 0.60 µm³/nC | |
| 20 pA/µm² | 0.23 µm³/nC | precursor-limited |
| 50 pA/µm² | 0.06 µm³/nC | sputtering wins |


| Ga⁺ current | Probe | Xe⁺ current | Probe |
|---|---|---|---|
| 25 pA | 7 nm | 30 pA | 22 nm |
| 100 pA | 12 nm | 100 pA | 29 nm |
| 800 pA | 24 nm | 1 nA | 57 nm |
| 2.5 nA | 39 nm | 15 nA | 150 nm |
| 9 nA | 79 nm | 60 nA | 281 nm |
| 65 nA | 359 nm | 500 nA | 1.2 µm |





| Current | Target | Top / 3 µm down | Amorphous per face |
|---|---|---|---|
| 800 pA | 500 nm | 501 / 512 nm | 20–21 nm |
| 300 pA | 250 nm | 249 / 260 nm | 21 nm |
| 80 pA | 130 nm | 131 / 141 nm | 20–21 nm |
| 50 pA | 100 nm | 101 / 111 nm | 20–21 nm |



| Ion | 30 kV | 16 kV | 8 kV | 5 kV | 2 kV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ga⁺ | 22 | 13 | 8 | 6.5 | 3.9 |
| Xe⁺ | 17 | 12 | 8 | 6.2 | 4.1 |
| Ar⁺ | 31 | 18 | 10 | 7.9 | 4.2 |
About half the depth damaged at normal incidence, from FIB-view's binary-collision Monte Carlo (ZBL potential), for silicon. Xenon's heavier ions stop sooner; argon's lighter ones go deeper at the same energy. Plasma ions also leave no gallium.
Result. In this run: 80 nm at the top, 91 nm three micrometres down, 3.6 nm of amorphous silicon per face, ~73 nm of good crystal. Total ~1.5 h of instrument time.




| What you see | Likely cause | What to do |
|---|---|---|
| Trenches beside the site | Not at eucentric height | Redo step 1; check the ion and SEM images coincide |
| Rounded or eroded top edge | Cap too thin, or imaged with ions before capping | Thicker Pt cap; image with electrons |
| Vertical streaks on the face (curtains) | Milling through copper and oxide; no cap; plasma ions without rocking | Keep the cap; turn on the rocking mill; thin from the cap side |
| Face darkens toward the bottom | Wedge: no or too little over-tilt | Over-tilt ±1–2°; a short pass on each face |
| Lamella bends or bows | Current too high for the thickness; stress | Below 250 nm stay ≤ 300 pA; below 120 nm ≤ 80 pA |
| Hole at the top | Thinned too far; cap gone | Stop earlier; judge from the 5 kV image, not the target setting |
| Weak, diffuse Kikuchi bands in TKD | Thick amorphous layers | Polish at 5 and 2 kV |
| Ga in EDS, grain boundaries attacked | Gallium implantation (Al, Cu alloys) | Use a xenon or argon plasma FIB; low-kV polish |
| Check | Value | Initials | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Site coated; eucentric height set at 0° and 52° | |||
| Electron-beam Pt deposited before any ion imaging of the site | |||
| Ion-beam Pt cap ≥ 1 µm, current density 2–6 pA/µm² | |||
| Bulk trenches deeper than the region of interest | |||
| Faces cleaned to ~1 µm; depth checked on the face | |||
| J-cut complete except the tab | |||
| Lamella welded to the post; needle cut free | |||
| Thinning: current stepped down; over-tilt used on both faces | |||
| Uniform brightness at 5 kV (no wedge, no hole, not bent) | |||
| Polished at 5 kV and 2 kV | |||
| Final thickness estimate and total time recorded |
Lamella mode runs these steps with real patterns on the chip; the thinning and polishing steps are yours to choose. The training task Lamella: thin to 100 nm hides the true thickness: you judge it from the 5 kV SEM view, rate your result, and then see the truth. With your consent the session is recorded, anonymously, for research on how operators judge thickness.
The link opens FIB-view with the training task Lamella: thin to 100 nm.
github.com/Advanced-EM/FIB-view
SOP-02 Python scripting: automate milling and thinning, and test algorithms against the hidden truth.
The TEM-view Console drives FIB-view too: focus, current, stigmator, stage.